Magic Lantern

Discussion in 'Photographic Industry' started by JimmyDranox, Apr 25, 2017.

Tags:
  1. JimmyDranox

    JimmyDranox Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    95
    Equipment:
    Canon 60D, Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, Sigma 17-50/2.8 OS HSM, Tamron 70-200/2.8
    I'm sure most of you know about Magic Lantern. And also, that they have a forum. But I consider that it could be useful to launch a discution here about this program and our experience with it.

    For now, I don't know is this is a good section for this, so, I will wait for some feedback.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2017

  2. Vasile Guta-Ciucur

    Vasile Guta-Ciucur Active Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    128
    Location:
    Pistestii din Deal, Gorj, RO
    Equipment:
    Canon EOS 100D
    Canon Lens EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 III
    I strongly believe that the Magic Lantern is NOT for your first DSLR ever, which happens to be a Canon DSLR. The risk is too big. But yes, I've tried it on my first and only Canon DSLR :p (I even played the game). It is of beta quality, but adds some features not officially available as time lapse photography and focus peaking - I was not interested in film features and rarely use my Canon in liveview mode. I discarded the ML after a while, considering that for me is not worth the risk - if focus peaking would have been much better than it is, maybe...
     
  3. JimmyDranox

    JimmyDranox Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    95
    Equipment:
    Canon 60D, Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, Sigma 17-50/2.8 OS HSM, Tamron 70-200/2.8
    About the risk involved. I have used ML for about 4 month, but not very intensively. In two occasions, when I have pushed it to hard, with very slow frame rate, and other changes combined, my camera has stoped working, but it has recovered after I have taken out the batteries. So, not a big problem. but I have learn that I have to go in small steps, to not cross the limits.

    It deserve for a still photographer, not interested in video? So and so. Apart from focus peaking, which is not very good, but can be useful, I only observed two small improvements. First, the battery level is always on the info display, and is in percents. So no need to go in the meniu to check it. The second is when I download the pictures. Before ML, when I download with a cable, only jpg files was moved to computer, using EOS Utility. To download RAW files, I must take the card out, and inserted in the computer. Now, I can download both type of files with the cable.

    Things are a lot different for video. But I'm still new in this field, and I have a lot to test, So, I will come back with my impresions while I would gain more experience.

    But there is a first usefull thing I can say now. Internal temperature in camera, which is displayed while filming. Colored in green, yellow, or red, while it grows. And it grows when you're making movies. I don't know if is available for shoting stills, but I think that in most situations, is no need for this.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2017
  4. Weetbix

    Weetbix New Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    16
    Equipment:
    Film Cameras: T80, EOS 30
    DIgital Cameras: 1100d, 5Dmk2
    the only real useful feature for photography is the dual-iso mode, works a treat on a old t3/1100d.
     

Share This Page